Media Consulta
35 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Berlin 1
16.10.2007
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Below-average salary. Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 2
01.07.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 3
26.07.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Interesting tasks. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 4
18.08.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Fair payments. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 5
05.10.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. Below-average salary. Good future prospects. Satisfactory employment site.
Berlin 6
06.10.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 7
17.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 8
27.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 9
30.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 10
04.12.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Filling employment. Good future prospects. Satisfactory employment site.
Berlin 11
18.03.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 12
20.03.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 13
20.05.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 14
23.02.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 15
21.02.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Berlin 16
27.03.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 17
24.03.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 18
03.04.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 19
13.02.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Berlin 20
09.01.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Problematic management style. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 21
15.01.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 22
17.01.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 23
27.09.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 24
31.07.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: High payments. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 25
11.12.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 26
02.04.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 27
02.08.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Beneficial career. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 28
19.08.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Excellent activity. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Satisfactory employment site.
Germany 29
14.05.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 30
30.07.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Cologne 31
02.08.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Recommendable workplace.
Cologne 32
08.10.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Cologne 33
27.08.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Excellent activity. Fair payments. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Cologne 34
17.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Cologne 35
27.08.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Excellent activity. Fair payments. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
